
I have decided to post about School Library Journal’s belated reference to Jewish American Heritage Month, which is shared with Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Month. SLJ posted three reviews of Holocaust-themed books, beginning on May 23. All appeared on the blog, Good Comics for Kids. The first review’s title does not connect it to Jewish American Heritage Month, but the review’s first sentence does. It appeared over Memorial Day Weekend with six days left in the month. These are some of recent the posts for Asian American Heritage Month, along with the date they first appeared:
- April 24 “31 YA Novels for Every Day of AAPI Heritage Month and Beyond”
- May 1 “AAPI Women Narrators in the Joys and Challenges of the Job”
- May 9, “Pearl” (This book review begins, “May is Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month…”)
- May 18, “Celebrating Asian American Native Hawai’ian Pacific Islander Heritage Month with Comic Books for Kids”
- May 24, “19 Audiobook for Listeners of All Ages Featuring Asian and Asian American Characters.”
Finally, on May 29, the same reviewer on the Good Comics for Kids blog posted this. The review opens with this surprising assertion: “It seemed like a bit of fate to find this book just as the month of May wraps up and AAPI Heritage and Jewish Heritage Month come to an end.”
I respect the reviewer’s choices of books to cover and I do not doubt the sincerity of her endorsement. It is not “a bit of fate” that she found the book. The book was published last September (when I reviewed it for Jewish Book Council). It is a distinguished work of graphic historical fiction, and also the third Holocaust-themed book reviewed on the Good Comics blog this month. Several posts about upcoming June holidays were posted on SLJ before any of these reviews.
Not only did SLJ begin to celebrate Asian American Heritage Month at the end of April, but, as readers will see from the partial list above, the articles feature books on a variety of subjects. Some were featured on the front page as the main headline, with the Heritage Month connection as part of the title.
Meanwhile, as mentioned, there have been three recent book reviews, all about the Holocaust, all on the Good Comics for Kids blog, all graphic works. I am definitely not opposed to YA books about the Holocaust. I do not share the opinion that this subject has been overexposed or that attention to the Holocaust necessarily detracts from an emphasis on other, more uplifting, aspects of Jewish history. However, in the context of May’s Heritage Month, it is significant that Asian American literature is presented with an appropriate focus on many experiences, not all of them tragic. The choice of a Holocaust book may simply reflect the fact that SLJ did not begin coverage earlier in the month, and was then necessarily restricted to a narrow range of topics. The decision to feature them all on the Good Comics blog is less clear.
The custom of designating certain months for awareness of an ethnic group in the United States dates to 1926, when the eminent Black historian Carter G. Woodson chose one week in February (later expanded to the full month) to focus on the under-recognized past of Black Americans. Although there is no one official resource about this greatly expanded custom, it now includes many more groups and their achievements in different areas. Asian and Jewish Americans share the month of May, a fact widely acknowledged by many organizations and publications as well as the U.S. Government. (Other Americans, including women, LGBTQ people, and people with disabilities, also have months selected to raise awareness about their importance.) My concern here is specifically with children’s literature, within the larger context of Jewish American Heritage Month, specifically with the question of why a major source of information about children’s books would selectively endorse only one of the two groups in May. Here are some examples of institutions that did not commit this oversight and recognized May as both Jewish American heritage Month and AAPI Heritage Month, from journals in the same space as SLJ to public libraries to private publishers: The Horn Book; The New York Public Library; and Lerner Publishing Group.
One week into the month, when I noticed that several publications had not yet posted about Jewish Americans, but had honored Asian Americans, I contacted editors and corporate staff members. Publishers Weekly Children’s Bookshelf Newsletter had not yet posted any Jewish-themed material; they responded on May 20 that they intended to do so shortly. On May 23, a list of featured Jewish heritage-themed books appeared. (Kirkus Reviews had posted about Asian American, but not Jewish, heritage, and also still has not responded)
I contacted the Editor-in-Chief of School Library Journal on May 7, and I heard back on May 13; her one-sentence reply thanked me for my feedback. I contacted her again, asking when I could expect a post about Jewish American Heritage, but I did not hear back. Although it is still May, they have included several posts about Father’s Day, Caribbean Heritage, and the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, all of which are observed in June (Eid al-Adha follows a lunar calendar, but coincides with June this solar year). As pointed out in the list above, articles in May have specifically referred to Asian-American Heritage Month. This is an important distinction. Recognizing their participation in this half of May’s Heritage Month program confers value on Asian American literature, while denying that value to its Jewish American counterpart.
Why does this matter? One could argue that “heritage months” are nothing but tokenism, and that they have been commercialized to the point of negating their original purpose. Perhaps they are now the equivalent of greeting card holidays, like Mother’s and Father’s Days. Do mothers need flowers one day a year, or better access to health and child care all the time? Yet no one could credibly argue that Father’s Day merits attention, but Mother’s Day does not. It is also valid to consider if overall coverage throughout the year is not more significant than a brief, if more publicized, focus. Again, that assumption would hold for other groups, not only Jews. Given that Asian and Jewish Americans share the month of May, it serves as a test case in marginalization. Clearly, it requires a conscious decision to honor one group but not the other during their assigned month, regardless of any coverage they may receive throughout the year. I prefer to avoid the terms “cancel” and “erasure,” both of which have been largely co-opted by the right, but sadly, they would seem to apply to this deliberate exclusion of Jewish heritage. As noted above, as of today, SLJ has featured several pieces celebrating Asian American Heritage in 2024. If SLJ, or any other publication, had determined that “heritage months” had become irrelevant, that decision would logically apply to the general program.
What outlook is this pointed decision really expressing? As recently as 2022, SLJ did post about Jewish heritage in May. The title of that piece, which ran on May 12, 2022, was “29 Books that Celebrate All Aspects of Jewish Life/Jewish American Heritage Month.” The distinction between that all-encompassing tone and the last-minute addition of three book reviews, all about the Holocaust, all in one literary form, could not be more pronounced. If the current policy of ignoring Jewish Heritage Month is due to the horrific events in Israel and Gaza, that reaction would be unjustifiable. Heritage months are about American diversity. They do not imply approval of any country’s actions, nor do they place blame on Americans of diverse backgrounds for the suffering of innocent people. If that were true, SLJ and other publications would have to exclude any group whose origin can be traced to a nation with an illiberal government. Of course, this would include many Asian Americans, as well as Americans whose ancestry is rooted in Europe, Africa, the Americas, virtually everywhere on the globe. A tactical choice by a publication might be to avoid recommending Jewish-themed children’s books about Israel. I am not advocating that policy, but merely mentioning it, because it would provide a clear way to signal respect for Jewish Americans without implying support for Israel, if an editor considered that message essential. (Of course, adopting that approach would potentially raise questions about current conditions and conflicts involving other nations and groups.) In any case, readers would reasonably expect an explanation for this recent development, not an abrupt departure from a more inclusive position.
Antisemitism is an ongoing reality. Like other forms of prejudice and hatred, it includes both overt and subconscious forms. In trying to confront these internalized biases, those against Jews are not granted an exemption. One month should offer enough time and space to equally celebrate the rich heritage of two different groups that have enhanced the cultural mosaic of America.











































