Rumpelstiltskin – retold by Mac Barnett, illustrated by Carson Ellis
Orchard Books (Scholastic), 2026

Folklorists and authors, from the Brothers Grimm to Jane Yolen, have been drawn to the story of Rumpelstiltskin, the calculating little man who tries to deprive a woman of her child. Artists, from the classic illustrators Arthur Rackham and Walter Crane, to Paul Zelinksky and Paul Galdone, have depicted its characters in strikingly different styles. Now, Mac Barnett and Carson Ellis have created their own response to this haunting tale.
As many fairy tales do, this one begins with a poor girl and her struggling father. Older readers familiar with the genre may anticipate a change in social and economic class, but younger ones may not. This girl is highly capable, “climbing trees and whittling sticks and catching tadpoles with her bare hands.” Ellis shows the young craftswoman intent on her work, with her father a distant figure in the background. He is a miller, but, although that is his professions, Barnett gives him a distinct, and irritating, personality. He has a “big mouth” and he brags. Life cannot be easy for his daughter.

The miller is either so socially inept or so bold, that he strikes up a conversation with the king, who is passing through town. This king is no more humble than his working class subject; Barnett reports that he is “chewed on a pheasant wing,” and “took a sip from a chalice,” as he casually strikes a deal with the miller to, possible, marry the laborer’s daughter. The king is a hard man to impress. Neither beauty nor personality strike him as unusual. But when the miller claims that his daughter can spin straw into gold, the king is sold.
Soon the girl is living in a castle, where she learns that there are two possibilities for her future in this nightmarish scenario of the patriarchy. She will either produce the gold or be killed. Before long, Rumpelstiltskin shows up, although she knows him only as “the little man.” Psychologically, he isn’t diminutive, but, rather, truncated. Taunting her with his amazing ability to actually turn the straw into gold, he demands successively greater payment for saving her life. Eventually, his price is her first-born child.

As people will do, the girl, now a queen, puts this terrible eventuality out of her mind. She has a little boy, and her love for him is so absorbing that she cannot imagine that her tormentor will force her to make good on her desperate promise. Among other elements, Rumpelstiltskin is a story about the power of language. The man returns, and tells the queen that she has three days to guess his name. Of course, he assumes that she will never be able to come up with his odd moniker, and the three days allow him to indulge his cruelty. Barnett and Ellis weave words and text together in a cascade of colorful guesses. “Cuthbert, Argyle, Ludvig, and Boniface,” are all possibilities, rolled out on Ellis’s elegant scroll of cursive words. The list grows to three pages, placed against white space for maximum effect. “Nidnod, Sheepshanks, and Lancelong” are all rejected. The queen’s son has the modest name of Tom, after both his father and grandfather, which, as Barnett points out, would not seem to deserve the honor.
Improbable events happen in fairy tales. The queen’s final guess causes smoke to spew out of Rumpelstiltskin’s ears in rage. The combination of fantastic and plainspoken words and imagery gives this version of the tale an inimitable twist. The queen survives, even if the men in the story are never held accountable for their stunning selfishness.





































